Shortlink

Grayson Questions Bernanke About Loans

“Which Foreigners Got the Fed’s $500,000,000,000?” Bernanke: “I Don’t Know.”

No, I don’t consider myself to be an economist. Being an avid reader, I stumbled across something that was very interesting, to say the least. I was reading a book entitled End The Fed, authored by Ron Paul, and then I ran into an intriguing concept. The subject was Exchange Stabilization Fund, an idea that I’m trying to grasp.

The Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) is an emergency reserve fund of the United States Treasury Department, normally used for foreign exchange intervention. This arrangement (as opposed to having the central bank intervene directly) allows the US government to influence currency exchange rates without affecting domestic money supply.

The U.S. Exchange Stabilization Fund was established at the Treasury Department by a provision in the Gold Reserve Act of January 31, 1934.

As of October 2009, the fund held assets worth $105 billion, including $58.1 billion in special drawing rights (SDR) from the International Monetary Fund. Okay, enough of that.

Then I ran across an amusing video. Alan Grayson, A former U.S. Representative for Florida’s 8th congressional district, popped a serious question to Ben Bernanke, the Fed Chair. “Which Foreigners Got the Fed’s $500,000,000,000?” Bernanke: “I Don’t Know.”

Grayson Questions Bernanke About Federal Reserve Loans

Grayson: There’s a table on page 26 which consists of your balance sheet, and one of the entries on the balance sheet is under Assets Central Bank Liquidity Swaps, which shows an increase from the end of 2007; from $24 billion to $533 billion in change, at the end of 2008. What’s that?

Bernanke: Those are swaps that were done with foreign central banks. Many foreign banks are short dollars and slip into our markets looking for dollars and drive up interest rates and create volatility in our markets. What we have done is with a number of major central banks, like European Central Bank for example, we swap our currency dollars for their currency Euros. They take the dollars and lend it out to the banks in their jurisdiction. That helps bring down interest rates in the global market for dollars, and meanwhile we’re not lending to those banks; we’re lending to the central bank. The central bank is responsible for repaying us.

Grayson: So, who got the money?

Bernanke: [It went] To financial institutions in Europe and other countries.

Grayson: Which ones?

Bernanke: I don’t know.

Grayson: Half a trillion dollars and you don’t know who got the money?

Bernanke: The loans go to the central banks and they put them out to their institutions to try to bring down short-term interest rates.

Grayson: Well, let’s start out with which central banks got the money.

Bernanke: There are fourteen of them, I’m sure they’re listed in here somewhere.

Grayson: So, who actually made that decision to hand out a half a trillion dollars that way? Who made that decision?

Bernanke: The Federal Open Market Committee.

Grayson: Was it done at one time or in a series of meetings?

Bernanke: A series of meetings.

Grayson: And under what legal authority?

Bernanke: We have a longstanding authority to do swaps with other central banks. It’s not an emergency authority of any kind.

Grayson: Anything specific about it?

Bernanke: My counsel says Section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act.

Grayson: We actually looked at one of the arrangements, and one of the arrangements is $9 billion for New Zealand. That works out to $3,000 for every single person for who lives in New Zealand. Seriously, wouldn’t it be better to extend that kind of credit to Americans, rather than New Zealanders?

Bernanke: It’s not costing Americans anything. We’re getting interest back and it’s not at the cost of any American credit. We are extending credit to Americans.

Grayson: Wouldn’t it necessarily affect the credit markets if you extend a half a trillion dollars credit to anybody?

Bernanke: We are lending to all U.S. financial institutions in exactly the same.

Grayson: Look at the next page. The very next page has the US dollar nominal exchange rate, which shows a 20% increase in the US dollar nominal exchange rate at exactly the same time that you’re handing out a half a trillion dollars to foreigners. Do you think that’s a coincidence?

Bernanke: Yes.

Grayson: The Constitution (art. I. § 9) says “no money shall be drawn from the treasury but in consequence appropriations made by law”. Do you think it’s consistent with the spirit of that provision of constitution for a group like the FMOC (Federal Open Market Committee) to hand out a half a trillion dollars to foreigners, without any action by this congress?

Bernanke: Congress approved it in the Federal Reserve Act.

Grayson: When was that?

Bernanke: Quite a long time ago. I don’t know the exact date. The Federal Reserve Act was in 1913.

Grayson: At that time the entire gross national product of this country was well under a half a trillion dollars, wasn’t it?

Bernanke: I don’t know.

Grayson: It is safe to say that nobody in 1913 contemplated that your small little group of people would decide to hand out a half a trillion dollars to foreigners?

Bernanke: This particular authority has been used numerous times over the years.

Grayson: Actually, according to the chart on page 28, virtually the entire amount that’s reflect on your entire balance sheet went out starting in the last quarter of 2007. And before that, going back to the beginning of this chart, the amount of lending was zero, to foreigners.

Bernanke: It was zero before the crisis. This was part of the process working with other central banks to try to get dollar money markets working normally in a global economy.

Shortlink

Are Kids In School Being Brainwashed?

The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of People

What’s really going on with the education system in the United States? Are kids in school being brainwashed? Are public schools silently pushing propaganda?

A person named Charlotte Iserbyt once confronted a local elementary school principal, and she requested to see the textbooks (social studies) for elementary schools. Not fully realizing her motives or her background, he consented and gave her the manual for teachers.

Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration. She has done her homework.

The manual really disturbed Iserbyt and she began to question the educational system in America. She would spend a great part of her adult life investigating, writing, and studying about the methods that are being imposed on children in the classrooms.

Her book is titled the deliberate dumbing down of america – A Chronological Paper Trail: A Chronological Paper Trail.

Charlotte explains how school superintendents, faculty members, teachers, and staff are expected to follow a regimen that is prescribed by elite members of society. Programs are being implemented that are to change the students’ attitudes and moral attitudes.

Certain members in the school system are what Charlotte refers to as “change agents”. The change agents have a primary goal — “to destroy traditional morality and academics”. Mind control of the masses is much cheaper than bombs or use of force.

According to Charlotte, the goal is to crash moral values and to crash all academics so that a heavy hand can impose more of a totalitarian rule.

Is Charlotte Iserbyt a “conspiracy buff” or is she a genius?

Shortlink

Shoes That Make You Go — Ahhh!

The only athletic shoe manufacturer still making shoes in the US.

Looking for high performance running shoes? Are you interested in high quality running shoes that are made in the USA? Maybe you just want stylish, athletic shoes that make you look good. See why millions of Americans are wearing the New Balance Men’s MR993 Running Shoe. Finally, shoes that make you go — ahhh!

Product Description
The New Balance 993 in black, part of the Heritage collection, is the made in USA durable high-mileage trainer where superior comfort meets classic style. It is a stability running shoe which provides both a stable platform and a smooth transition. Color Featured: Black.

From New Balance website:

New Balance is the only athletic shoe manufacturer still making shoes in the US. We’re proud of that commitment. We’re proud of the workers in our five New England factories.

And we’re proud to say that 25% of our shoes sold in The United States are made or assembled right here.

Shortlink

Lottery Tax Results

Betting On State Lottery Taxes

The lottery ticket buyer gaped at the expected value incredulously, but feverishly moved forward to purchase the ticket, and soon may do the bidding online. More lottery tax results on the news at eleven

Go ahead and call me a skeptic, a cynic, or even a pessimist. I won’t have a problem with that. When I feel the vibes, I feel the vibes. The topic of the day: lottery tickets are actually big prizes for government. Please tell me it isn’t so?

I was  intrigued, if not a bit apprehensive about the recurring overpromotion of Mega Millions. It suddenly dawned on me that the publicity was abound like fireworks in July. The skepticism in me was flowing; my senses told me that there could be more on the canvas than was being divulged.

Then, perhaps by chance, I stumbled upon a juicy opinion piece that was freshly published. Ahhh, to my surprise, my intuition was right again. The clinching title: Lottery buyers line up to pay a tax. I wasn’t the only skeptic. There were well over 1,000 comments on the page and over 2,000 likes.

The incredibly talented author filled in the gaps of my preposterous theory for me. If permitted to do so, I will add his quote to this post:

State lotteries only pay out an average of 60% of their gross revenues, a payout vastly inferior to those of slot machines and table games, which offer payouts in many cases above 90%….

What was that you say? State and federal governments relying on these huge profits for revenue?

Troubling to the author was the fact that a great portion of lottery ticket currency was pouring in from low-income buyers. And low-income buyers were spending most of their incomes on lottery tickets. There have been extensive studies to back up these claims.

Their odds for winning the lottery were 1 in 176 million. Gee, that’s not so bad.

So, my convoluted case is shaping. I have resolved that while there are winners who do win really large sums of money, lottery tickets are no more than a tax. If one could see through the cloaked objective, then one would discover that people are literally lining up in droves to pay more taxes. Thus, further lining state coffers.

The author raises another valid point. Winners of huge sums are “subject to a 25% federal withholding and state withholding rates as high as 12%.”

I also watched a PBS Frontline episode, Betting On The Lottery, which aired on November 6th, 1990. This enlightening episode deals with the Illinois state lottery. A bit outdated in some respects, but the steam is still there.